In the EU, generative AI (GenAI) systems can be trained on works protected by copyright (under a text and data mining exception introduced in 2019 in the Copyright Directive), provided the rights holders have not reserved their rights (opted-out) in an appropriate manner.
To ensure that the reservation of rights by rights holders leads to their fair remuneration, the AI Act introduced specific requirements for providers of generative AI models to:
- have a policy in place about identifying and respecting opt-outs by rights holders;
- publish a sufficiently detailed summary of the content used for training, so that rights holders can check respect of their opt-outs.
Notwithstanding these clarifications introduced by the AI Act, the debate around AI and copyright remains controversial, mainly due to the fact that:
- EU rules provide no indication of what manner is considered "appropriate" to opt-out. In practice, rights holders use different opt-out systems;
- No licensing mechanisms exist at the EU level to compensate rights holders for use of copyright material.
The EU Commission is expected to review the Copyright Directive and to evaluate possible improvements in 2026.
Cullen International’s new benchmark tracks the national initiatives (legislative or non-legislative) that are taken at country level on top of these EU-wide rules.
These include for instance national intiatives that:
- interpret EU legislation and the data mining exception;
- facilitate the licensing of copyright protected works for use in GenAI; or
- protect artists from the creation of digital replicas of their voice, image or performances without consent.
Among the covered countries, these topics are addressed by:
- legislative provisions, in Italy (adopted), Finland (discussed), France (on hold), Spain (withdrawn) or government’s guidelines (Sweden);
- consultations (France and the UK);
- experts working groups (Finland, France, Ireland and the UK);
- governments’ strategies (France) or similar (coalition treaty in Germany);
- studies commissioned by public authorities (France, Germany, the Netherlands).
For more information and access to the full benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our European Media service.
See also our research on related initiatives in the Americas and across the globe.
more news
10 June 26
Digital identity systems: governance, regulation and emerging trends
Digital ID systems are becoming key enablers of digital economies, supporting access to public and private digital services. Cullen International's new report explores the different governance mechanisms applied across the world, as well as different architectural designs.
05 June 26
Alternative delivery operators mostly remain outside postal regulation
Our new European benchmark provides information on whether alternative delivery operators are considered as postal service providers.
01 June 26
Privacy in the digital age
Our latest benchmark compares data protection laws across 14 jurisdictions. It covers recent legal updates, lawful bases for processing personal data, and extraterritorial applicability. It also examines privacy rules for location, biometric, and children’s data, as well as enforcement practices involving these data types and big tech groups.