In the EU, generative AI (GenAI) systems can be trained on works protected by copyright (under a text and data mining exception introduced in 2019 in the Copyright Directive), provided the rights holders have not reserved their rights (opted-out) in an appropriate manner.
To ensure that the reservation of rights by rights holders leads to their fair remuneration, the AI Act introduced specific requirements for providers of generative AI models to:
- have a policy in place about identifying and respecting opt-outs by rights holders;
- publish a sufficiently detailed summary of the content used for training, so that rights holders can check respect of their opt-outs.
Notwithstanding these clarifications introduced by the AI Act, the debate around AI and copyright remains controversial, mainly due to the fact that:
- EU rules provide no indication of what manner is considered "appropriate" to opt-out. In practice, rights holders use different opt-out systems;
- No licensing mechanisms exist at the EU level to compensate rights holders for use of copyright material.
The EU Commission is expected to review the Copyright Directive and to evaluate possible improvements in 2026.
Cullen International’s new benchmark tracks the national initiatives (legislative or non-legislative) that are taken at country level on top of these EU-wide rules.
These include for instance national intiatives that:
- interpret EU legislation and the data mining exception;
- facilitate the licensing of copyright protected works for use in GenAI; or
- protect artists from the creation of digital replicas of their voice, image or performances without consent.
Among the covered countries, these topics are addressed by:
- legislative provisions, in Italy (adopted), Finland (discussed), France (on hold), Spain (withdrawn) or government’s guidelines (Sweden);
- consultations (France and the UK);
- experts working groups (Finland, France, Ireland and the UK);
- governments’ strategies (France) or similar (coalition treaty in Germany);
- studies commissioned by public authorities (France, Germany, the Netherlands).
For more information and access to the full benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our European Media service.
See also our research on related initiatives in the Americas and across the globe.
more news
19 December 25
CSRD transposition: Belgium, Denmark, Finland and Slovenia transpose the “stop-the-clock” directive
Cullen International’s updated benchmark tracks the progress made by the 27 EU member states in transposing the CSRD and the related “stop-the-clock” directive.
19 December 25
Global trends in AI regulation
Our latest Global Trends benchmark compares policies and regulations on artificial intelligence (AI) across 14 jurisdictions around the world.
19 December 25
Implementation of European Media Freedom Act: general overview in 12 EU member states
Our new Media benchmark shows if there are initiatives/rules in the selected countries which aim to put into application the EU Media Freedom Act (EMFA). If yes, it describes the scope of the main measures proposed. The benchmark also provides information on the next legislative or regulatory steps.