Most countries in the Americas limit the legal liability of online intermediaries for third-party copyright infringements. Wherever these limits apply, they are commonly derived from amendments to traditional copyright laws in light of the digital environment.
This is one of the main findings discussed in Cullen International’s latest benchmark, which outlines limits on the legal liability of online intermediaries in the Americas. Particularly, the benchmark analyses limits on liability for third-party intellectual property infringements and acts of defamation, as well as the takedown obligations that apply to such illegal content.
In contrast, liability limitations for online intermediaries over trademark infringement are not the norm.

In all surveyed countries, online intermediaries are required to take down illegal content following a takedown request. Both the scope of the content subject to this obligation and how requests must be carried out vary.
The takedown obligation can arise from a court order or, in some jurisdictions, directly from a request by the copyright holder.
Three countries in the region have takedown obligations to protect individuals, especially women, against the unconsented exposure of intimate content.
To access the full benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our Americas Digital Economy service.
more news
04 November 26
In nine European countries, national symmetric obligations on access to ducts go beyond the scope set by the Gigabit Infrastructure Act
Cullen International's latest benchmark analyses asymmetric and symmetric duct access obligations in Europe.
04 November 26
More than 60 cases and counting: a snapshot of European antitrust enforcement against big tech
Cullen International’s latest report on past and pending antitrust cases against big tech companies in Europe tracks enforcement activity under ex post antitrust rules at EU and national level.
30 October 26
Many governments around the globe rely on legal mechanisms to compel communications apps to cooperate in law enforcement investigations
Cullen International's latest Global Trends benchmark for number-independent communications apps regulation found that nearly all of the 13 surveyed jurisdictions around the world provide some legal mechanism to make these apps assist law enforcement in criminal investigations. There are requirements to verify user identities, compel disclosure of stored content, make encrypted content accessible, and duties to detect illegal content within private communications.