According to new Global Trends research by Cullen International on policies and regulation on artificial intelligence (AI), most monitored jurisdictions have so far launched national strategies or plans on AI.
Regulatory intervention on AI is starting to emerge. Half of the monitored jurisdictions have either adopted (China and the EU) or proposed (Brazil, Canada, India, Korea and the US) regulations addressing AI systems.
In general, most jurisdictions do not prohibit AI applications provided those applications do not infringe any law. However, some expressly prohibit certain applications and uses of AI (e.g. China, the EU).
None of the monitored jurisdictions has published privacy rules for AI apart from the general privacy laws. However, Korea, Singapore, and the UK have published non-binding privacy guidelines for AI to complement their general privacy laws.
Most monitored jurisdictions have adopted rules or guidelines for AI-based decision making, mainly requiring transparency and/or risk assessment for high-risk AI systems.
China, the EU, South Africa and Taiwan allow an invention made by a generative AI system to be a patentable invention, if the invention has a “technical character”. Most of the monitored jurisdictions have not decided if AI-generated content is eligible for copyright protection. However, under certain conditions, some jurisdictions (e.g. Japan, the UK) allow the person using AI to generate content to be the author of the work.
All the monitored jurisdictions allow (or decided not to regulate) the use of generative AI systems in education. Only China regulates the use of deep synthesis technology in general. Other countries (e.g. Brazil, Korea) regulate the use of deepfakes in election periods.
The research covers Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union (EU), India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, South Africa, Taiwan, the UK, and the US.
For more information and access to the full benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to the Global Trends service.
more news
27 June 25
Can European end users choose their own router or modem?
Our new benchmark research shows that national regulators clearly defined the network termination point in five of the 14 European countries studied.
26 June 25
Data Protection in the Americas
Recent research highlights contrasts in the enforcement of data protection laws across the Americas. While most countries have legal frameworks in place to penalise violations, the scale of fines—both in terms of maximum fine limits and actual enforcement—varies widely. The findings also reveal that fines imposed in Europe are often significantly higher than those recorded in the Americas.
25 June 25
Most MENA telecoms regulators set fixed and mobile quality targets
Our latest benchmark on quality of service (QoS) provides detailed data on the QoS targets set in 12 studied Middle East and North African countries.