Around half of mobile network sharing agreements in Europe are RAN sharing agreements without spectrum pooling. This is one of the main findings of Cullen International’s updated benchmark on mobile network sharing, analysing the regulatory framework and main agreements between operators in European countries.
Mobile operators often share their networks to reduce costs. Most of the infrastructure sharing agreements are the result of commercial negotiations rather than regulatory intervention. However, national authorities may regulate these agreements, and sometimes promote them to extend and improve mobile coverage, as is often the case for national roaming agreements.
The agreements may only be related to site sharing or may involve the radio access network (RAN), with or without spectrum pooling. Agreements can also be extended to the core network.
Our latest benchmark shows that 17 agreements out of the 35 analysed are RAN sharing without spectrum pooling, while nine are RAN sharing with spectrum pooling. Nine other cases involve another typology (e.g. roaming).
For more information and to access the full benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our European Telecoms service.
more news
09 October 26
Four LATAM countries address connectivity gaps
Cullen International’s latest LATAM Telecoms Update highlights policy developments over the past three months affecting the regulation of radio spectrum, wholesale networks and consumer protection in six markets in the region: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Peru.
08 October 26
Many European countries consider banning minors from accessing social media
Cullen International has just published a new version of its benchmark which tracks the current debates/ initiatives on banning access to social media to protect minors online in Europe.
05 October 26
Ireland, the Netherlands and France account for the highest sum of data protection fines against large digital platforms
Our latest benchmark tracks fines imposed on large digital platforms by data protection and other supervisory authorities in 19 European countries since May 2018. It covers GDPR and e-Privacy Directive infringements and identifies whether the GDPR consistency mechanism was used in cross-border cases.