This latest Global Trends research analyses policies and regulations related to IoT from three main perspectives.
- Government perspective: the first section of the benchmark looks at whether governments have adopted strategies and policies for IoT network deployments and take-up by industry, consumers, and the public sector.
- Consumer IoT: the take-up of IoT-based products and services depends on the level of understanding and trust consumers have in this technology. The second section of the benchmark analyses IoT-related privacy, security and liability frameworks in each of the jurisdictions covered.
- Industrial IoT: the third section of the benchmark looks at industrial sectors where IoT growth perspectives are usually more prominent. The verticals analysed for each jurisdiction are agriculture, automotive, healthcare, smart cities, and utilities such as energy and water.
The Global Trends benchmark on IoT in the data economy covers 12 jurisdictions: Australia, Brazil, China, the European Union, India, Japan, Korea, Rwanda, Singapore, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
According to the research:
- Although approaches and priorities vary, all governments covered in this research aim to leverage IoT to make their respective economies and societies ‘smarter’.
- Several government policies and voluntary initiatives in recent years addressed privacy concerns bound to the widespread use of consumer IoT services and devices.
- Most jurisdictions recently revised their cybersecurity policies and regulations or proposed new requirements to increase IoT product security and user protection.
Other key findings are accessible in our full global research on IoT. Please click on “Access the full content” to view the benchmark - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our Global Trends service.
more news
12 March 26
National implementation of the EU Gigabit Infrastructure Act
The Gigabit Infrastructure Act (GIA) is a regulation and as such directly applicable in all member states without the need for transposition into national law. Despite being a regulation, the GIA often sets minimum requirements, on top of which member states can adopt additional measures to address country-specific circumstances. Our new benchmark shows the choices made by member states when implementing the GIA.
09 March 26
How are EU member states transposing NIS2?
Our latest benchmark tracks the progress of the Directive on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the EU (NIS2) transposition in the 27 EU member states.
05 March 26
CSRD: Austria and Malta finalise national transposition
Cullen International’s latest benchmark tracks the progress made by the 27 EU member states in transposing the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the related “stop-the-clock” directive.