When facing any kind of issue regarding for example quality of service, access or billing, consumers should first address a complaint to their service providers, before referring to the national regulator, mediator, or any other competent authority.
Cullen International’s research shows that in six of the 15 European countries studied, there are no rules setting a maximum timeframe for providers to respond to a complaint.
In some cases, however, operators set such maximum timeframes in practice even in the absence of mandatory deadlines. These timeframes can be part of an industry agreement, like in Belgium, or included in the operators' general terms and conditions, like in France.
When maximum timeframes are set by law or regulation, they vary from two days (in Ireland for example) up to 45 days in Italy (where providers can set shorter deadlines themselves).
For more information and access to the benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our European Consumer Protection (in Telecoms) service.
more news
03 April 26
Spectrum policy and new consumer protection rules in the LATAM telecoms market
Cullen International’s latest LATAM Telecoms Update highlights policy developments over the past three months affecting the regulation of radio spectrum, wholesale networks and consumer protection in six markets in the region: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Peru.
30 March 26
Transposition status of key EU environmental directives
Our latest benchmark contains summary information on the transposition status of six key EU environmental directives.
26 March 26
What are New Competition Tools and who wields them?
Our new benchmark surveys which European countries have introduced so-called new competition tools (NCTs), also known as market investigation powers. NCTs enable competition authorities to intervene in markets without establishing an infringement of antitrust rules.