When facing any kind of issue regarding for example quality of service, access or billing, consumers should first address a complaint to their service providers, before referring to the national regulator, mediator, or any other competent authority.
Cullen International’s research shows that in six of the 15 European countries studied, there are no rules setting a maximum timeframe for providers to respond to a complaint.
In some cases, however, operators set such maximum timeframes in practice even in the absence of mandatory deadlines. These timeframes can be part of an industry agreement, like in Belgium, or included in the operators' general terms and conditions, like in France.
When maximum timeframes are set by law or regulation, they vary from two days (in Ireland for example) up to 45 days in Italy (where providers can set shorter deadlines themselves).
For more information and access to the benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our European Consumer Protection (in Telecoms) service.
more news
04 February 26
The DNA explained: towards guidance on specialised services and reduced reporting obligations under the EU net neutrality rules
Cullen International is issuing a series of analyses on different aspects of the Digital Networks Act (DNA) proposal. This report covers net neutrality.
04 February 26
The DNA explained: single EU-level satellite framework to replace national authorisations
Cullen International is issuing a series of analyses on different aspects of the Digital Networks Act (DNA) proposal. This report covers satellite connectivity.
02 February 26
Digital Networks Act: texts comparison in the Cullen Legislation Navigator
Cullen International has updated its Legislation Navigator with the official text of the proposed Digital Networks Act (DNA). It allows easy browsing through the 416 recitals, 210 articles, 50 definitions and 6 annexes proposed.