The UK government presented on 25 April 2023 a new draft ex ante regime for big tech companies. The government considers that “the unprecedented market power, in relation to certain digital activities, of a small number of businesses, is holding back innovation and growth.”
The rules are part of the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers (DMCC) Bill, which also contains provisions on competition and consumer protection. Now the bill needs to be approved by parliament.
Cullen International's analysis looks into the main aspects of the new ex ante regime for big tech companies in the UK, and how it would compare with the EU Digital Markets Act (DMA).
Key differences include:
- The UK regime could target fewer players than the EU one, as an annual turnover threshold of £25bn (€28.31bn) worldwide, or £1bn (€1.13bn) in the UK, would have to be met in all cases.
- The UK regime would be more flexible as, while the DMA contains a closed list of digital services and obligations, the bill would allow the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to identify digital services and impose bespoke conduct requirements on companies with strategic market status (SMS). Additional requirements could be imposed through “pro-competition interventions”.
- Contrary to the EU Digital Markets Act, the UK regime would allow SMS companies to justify their practices by invoking countervailing benefits.
For more information and access to the full analysis, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our European Digital Economy service.
more news
04 November 26
In nine European countries, national symmetric obligations on access to ducts go beyond the scope set by the Gigabit Infrastructure Act
Cullen International's latest benchmark analyses asymmetric and symmetric duct access obligations in Europe.
04 November 26
More than 60 cases and counting: a snapshot of European antitrust enforcement against big tech
Cullen International’s latest report on past and pending antitrust cases against big tech companies in Europe tracks enforcement activity under ex post antitrust rules at EU and national level.
30 October 26
Many governments around the globe rely on legal mechanisms to compel communications apps to cooperate in law enforcement investigations
Cullen International's latest Global Trends benchmark for number-independent communications apps regulation found that nearly all of the 13 surveyed jurisdictions around the world provide some legal mechanism to make these apps assist law enforcement in criminal investigations. There are requirements to verify user identities, compel disclosure of stored content, make encrypted content accessible, and duties to detect illegal content within private communications.