This Global Trends benchmark on privacy in the digital age covers Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, India, Ireland, Japan, Korea, Singapore, South Africa, and the United States.
Among the main findings of this research:
- A new privacy law was adopted in China in November 2021 and the amended privacy law in Japan became effective in April 2022. Canada and India both introduced new privacy bills to Parliament.
- Most of the surveyed countries apply general privacy rules to location data and treat biometric data as a sensitive category of personal data, where explicit consent is generally required.
- Not all countries have set up an independent data protection authority (DPA). In the countries which have DPAs, they vary significantly in their years of operation and level of resources. Concerns about insufficient resources have been expressed even in advanced regions like the EU.
- There are few examples of significant data protection fines involving big tech, and the fines have generally been low compared to the size of the companies. The one standout is the US where Facebook reached a US$5bn settlement with the US government. In the EU, the Luxembourg DPA imposed the highest fine over General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) infringements (US$837m) on Amazon.
Read the full research and discover how privacy is regulated and its enforcement works in practice across 12 different geographies around the world by clicking on “Access the full content” (Global Trends clients).
To request the report and/or a demo of the Global Trends service, click on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our Global Trends service.
more news
04 November 26
In nine European countries, national symmetric obligations on access to ducts go beyond the scope set by the Gigabit Infrastructure Act
Cullen International's latest benchmark analyses asymmetric and symmetric duct access obligations in Europe.
04 November 26
More than 60 cases and counting: a snapshot of European antitrust enforcement against big tech
Cullen International’s latest report on past and pending antitrust cases against big tech companies in Europe tracks enforcement activity under ex post antitrust rules at EU and national level.
30 October 26
Many governments around the globe rely on legal mechanisms to compel communications apps to cooperate in law enforcement investigations
Cullen International's latest Global Trends benchmark for number-independent communications apps regulation found that nearly all of the 13 surveyed jurisdictions around the world provide some legal mechanism to make these apps assist law enforcement in criminal investigations. There are requirements to verify user identities, compel disclosure of stored content, make encrypted content accessible, and duties to detect illegal content within private communications.