According to new Global Trends research by Cullen International, approaches to social media regulation vary considerably around the world.
Growing use of social media, further accelerated in many countries by social distancing policies related with the COVID-19 pandemic, led several governments to revise some of the safeguards protecting online platforms from liability and responsibility for content shared by their end -users.
Among the countries analysed in this benchmark, over the past year, China, the EU, India, Japan, and the US revised (or proposed to revise) in some respects their respective safe harbour rules.
This 50+ page Global Trends benchmark covers different aspects of social media regulation:
- Licensing requirements, ownership restrictions, supervisory authorities, and taxation.
- Safe harbour: scope and main conditions for it to apply.
- Tackling harmful or illegal content on social media platforms.
The research covers: Australia, Brazil, China, the EU, France, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, and the US.
For more information and to access our report on social media regulation trends around the globe, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our Global Trends service.
more news
04 February 26
The DNA explained: towards guidance on specialised services and reduced reporting obligations under the EU net neutrality rules
Cullen International is issuing a series of analyses on different aspects of the Digital Networks Act (DNA) proposal. This report covers net neutrality.
04 February 26
The DNA explained: single EU-level satellite framework to replace national authorisations
Cullen International is issuing a series of analyses on different aspects of the Digital Networks Act (DNA) proposal. This report covers satellite connectivity.
02 February 26
Digital Networks Act: texts comparison in the Cullen Legislation Navigator
Cullen International has updated its Legislation Navigator with the official text of the proposed Digital Networks Act (DNA). It allows easy browsing through the 416 recitals, 210 articles, 50 definitions and 6 annexes proposed.