Co-regulation implies shared responsibility between the regulator and industry stakeholders. While the state is not present in self-regulation, in co-regulation the state gives the mandate to co-regulate in a specific area and/or ensures the enforcement of the co-regulatory system through back-stop powers.
In particular, the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD) encourages EU members states use co-regulation for the protection of minors (e.g. regarding media service providers’ obligation to adequately inform viewers about content that may be harmful to minors) and advertising (e.g. to reduce children’s exposure to advertising for junk food and alcoholic beverages).
Cullen International’s latest research shows that eight out of the eleven member states surveyed have co-regulatory systems in place, which cover areas such as: content classification/labelling/watershed, advertising, access control technology, and promotion of a healthy diet and physical activity.
Finland, Germany and the Netherlands have optimal co-regulatory systems in place for the protection of minors in both linear television and on demand services.
To access the complete research, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our services.
23 May 19
5 must-watch competition law cases - Bonus Case: Google’s Android Auto app risks an antitrust slap
Over several weeks, we share summaries of intriguing pending cases from our Competition Law database.
16 May 19
Now also covering Belgium in our benchmark of Consumer Protection in European Telecoms
Cullen International's benchmarks on consumer protection in telecoms now also cover Belgium.
13 May 19
5 must-watch competition law cases - Case 5: Good move (from joint to sole control)?
Over the next weeks, we will share summaries of five intriguing pending cases from our Competition Law database.