The rights of the multiple authors and performers who contribute to an audiovisual work are protected by specific copyright and related regulations, which grant them exclusive rights to exploit their works.
However, because the exploitation of an audiovisual work usually requires an intricate rights clearance and licensing process involving multiple agents and intermediaries, the authors’ economic rights are in practice often placed in the hands of producers who exercise exploitation rights on behalf of the contributors. In such cases, the producers control the exploitation process and the main revenue streams.
In order to understand the functioning of the assignment or transfer of economic rights for audiovisual works, this new benchmark of the Americas shows:
- the rules, regulations and requirements that apply to the transfer of contributors’ economic rights;
- whether there is a legal presumption that economic rights are transferred to the producer; and
- the limitations of the scope or effect of any transfer of rights.
Our research shows, for instance, that Canada has no specific presumption of transfer for these rights, while a rebuttable presumption applies in the USA but only if the authors and the producer are in an employer-employee relationship. Both countries allow for the total transfer of the economic rights.
In Argentina, Brazil and Mexico, the law does not provide for any specific presumption of the transfer of economic rights to the producer but, in the rest of the Latam countries researched, these rights are presumed to be transferred.
Interested in the full benchmark? Please just click on the request access button below!
more news
28 March 24
Mobile mergers and competition law
Since 2004, 11 out of the 13 mobile mergers notified to competition authorities in the European Economic Area faced some form of intervention, with 3 of these transactions being blocked or withdrawn due to competition concerns. Our new Antitrust & Mergers Explainer looks at the assessment of mobile mergers, focusing on the European Commission’s case law over the past 20 years.
27 March 24
Regulating deepfakes in times of elections
In 2024 billions of people will be called to vote in different parts of the world. And a malicious use of deepfakes may affect citizens’ trust in their institutions and even manipulate human behaviour, including how they vote. This Global Trends report discusses recent policies and regulations on the use of deepfakes in the context of election processes.
20 March 24
[INFOGRAPHIC] Cullen cheat sheet on obligations and prohibitions under the Digital Markets Act
Cullen International has updated its cheat sheet providing an overview of the obligations of the EU Digital Markets Act (DMA) that the first companies designated as gatekeepers had to comply with by 7 March 2024.