EU member states are taking different approaches to designating the authorities responsible for enforcing the Data Governance Act (DGA) and the Data Act. As of August 2026, almost all of the 21 surveyed member states had designated the relevant competent authorities under the DGA, while only six had designated competent authorities for the Data Act.
Key findings
- All surveyed member states have designated all the competent authorities under the DGA, except the Czech Republic and Slovakia, where proposals are still pending.
- Telecoms regulators have a prominent role in Data Act enforcement, acting or being proposed as the single competent authority, data coordinator, or authority responsible for cloud-related provisions in several member states.
Background
The Data Governance Act applies since 24 September 2023 and requires EU member states to designate competent bodies and authorities for the reuse of protected public-sector data, data intermediation services and recognised data altruism organisations. Member states were required to notify the Commission of the identity of those competent authorities by this date.
The Data Act entered into application on 12 September 2025 and requires member states to designate one or more competent authorities for the enforcement of the regulation. When member states designate more than one authority, they should designate a data coordinator.
The European Commission's Digital Omnibus proposal, presented in November 2025, would repeal the DGA and transfer relevant provisions into the Data Act, but would not change the rules on competent authorities.
What the content covers
Cullen International’s latest Benchmark compares the authorities designated or proposed to enforce the Data Governance Act and the Data Act across 21 EU member states, including their respective roles and responsibilities.
Scope
Region: European Union
Countries covered: 21 EU member states
Policy area: Data regulation and enforcement
Source type: Benchmark
Relevant legislation or policy initiative: Data Governance Act, Data Act and the Digital Omnibus proposal
Last updated: August 2026
For more information and access to the full benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our European Digital Economy service.
more news
04 November 26
In nine European countries, national symmetric obligations on access to ducts go beyond the scope set by the Gigabit Infrastructure Act
Cullen International's latest benchmark analyses asymmetric and symmetric duct access obligations in Europe.
04 November 26
More than 60 cases and counting: a snapshot of European antitrust enforcement against big tech
Cullen International’s latest report on past and pending antitrust cases against big tech companies in Europe tracks enforcement activity under ex post antitrust rules at EU and national level.
30 October 26
Many governments around the globe rely on legal mechanisms to compel communications apps to cooperate in law enforcement investigations
Cullen International's latest Global Trends benchmark for number-independent communications apps regulation found that nearly all of the 13 surveyed jurisdictions around the world provide some legal mechanism to make these apps assist law enforcement in criminal investigations. There are requirements to verify user identities, compel disclosure of stored content, make encrypted content accessible, and duties to detect illegal content within private communications.