This Global Trends benchmark compares data protection laws across 12 major jurisdictions.
The European Union (EU), with its General Data Protection Regulation in force since 2018, has played a pivotal role in influencing legislative work and privacy debates in other parts of the world. New (or significantly amended) data protection legislation entered into force in the past three years in Brazil, China, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and South Africa. In the United States (US), despite the lack of comprehensive federal legislation, ten states already enacted their own privacy laws. Australia, Canada and India have recently been revising their respective privacy frameworks.
Most of the surveyed jurisdictions apply general privacy rules to location data and treat biometric data as a sensitive category of personal data, where explicit consent is generally required. Most of the surveyed jurisdictions have specific rules on children’s data (e.g. treating children’s data as sensitive information, requiring consent from their parents or guardians, among others).
Not all the jurisdictions covered in this benchmark have set up an independent data protection authority (DPA). Besides, in those where DPAs were established, responsibilities, organisation, and resources vary significantly.
The highest data protection fines involving big online platforms have so far been imposed in the US (US$5bn settlement with Facebook in 2019), the EU (€1.2bn fine on Meta Platforms in 2023), and China (CNY 8.03bn fine on Didi Global in 2022).
For more information and to access the full report, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to the Global Trends service.
more news
04 November 26
In nine European countries, national symmetric obligations on access to ducts go beyond the scope set by the Gigabit Infrastructure Act
Cullen International's latest benchmark analyses asymmetric and symmetric duct access obligations in Europe.
04 November 26
More than 60 cases and counting: a snapshot of European antitrust enforcement against big tech
Cullen International’s latest report on past and pending antitrust cases against big tech companies in Europe tracks enforcement activity under ex post antitrust rules at EU and national level.
30 October 26
Many governments around the globe rely on legal mechanisms to compel communications apps to cooperate in law enforcement investigations
Cullen International's latest Global Trends benchmark for number-independent communications apps regulation found that nearly all of the 13 surveyed jurisdictions around the world provide some legal mechanism to make these apps assist law enforcement in criminal investigations. There are requirements to verify user identities, compel disclosure of stored content, make encrypted content accessible, and duties to detect illegal content within private communications.