A recently updated Global Trends benchmark addresses the current approaches to the regulation of social media and video-sharing platforms, and the liability of platforms for content shared by their end users.
The research covers 12 jurisdictions from around the globe: Australia, Brazil, mainland China, the EU, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, South Africa, Taiwan, and the US.
The benchmark is divided in three parts. For each jurisdiction, it:
- provides an overview of the current regulatory framework applicable to social media and video-sharing platforms;
- presents the current safe harbour regime, and the main conditions required for it to apply; and
- describes legal frameworks and enforcement regimes used to control the posting and sharing of illegal or harmful content by users of social media and video-sharing platforms.
Harmful and illegal content shared on social media: different approaches around the world
In all the countries analysed for this benchmark, social media benefit from a form of safe harbour whereby providers may not be held liable for illegal content uploaded by their users if certain conditions are met.
However, each jurisdiction defines what is illegal and what platforms should do to counter the spread of illegal or harmful content. The benchmark covers child pornography, copyright infringements, fake news, terrorism and incitement to violence, and other potential infringements such as cyber-bullying and defamation.
"Fair compensation" of news publishers
Among the 12 jurisdictions covered in this benchmark, several introduced or proposed new legislation mandating that online platforms, such as Google and Facebook, pay news publishers (including local news publishers and broadcast media) for content made available on their online platforms.
For more information and to access the benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our Global Trends service.
more news
04 November 26
In nine European countries, national symmetric obligations on access to ducts go beyond the scope set by the Gigabit Infrastructure Act
Cullen International's latest benchmark analyses asymmetric and symmetric duct access obligations in Europe.
04 November 26
More than 60 cases and counting: a snapshot of European antitrust enforcement against big tech
Cullen International’s latest report on past and pending antitrust cases against big tech companies in Europe tracks enforcement activity under ex post antitrust rules at EU and national level.
30 October 26
Many governments around the globe rely on legal mechanisms to compel communications apps to cooperate in law enforcement investigations
Cullen International's latest Global Trends benchmark for number-independent communications apps regulation found that nearly all of the 13 surveyed jurisdictions around the world provide some legal mechanism to make these apps assist law enforcement in criminal investigations. There are requirements to verify user identities, compel disclosure of stored content, make encrypted content accessible, and duties to detect illegal content within private communications.