A recently updated Global Trends benchmark addresses the current approaches to the regulation of social media and video-sharing platforms, and the liability of platforms for content shared by their end users.
The research covers 12 jurisdictions from around the globe: Australia, Brazil, mainland China, the EU, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, South Africa, Taiwan, and the US.
The benchmark is divided in three parts. For each jurisdiction, it:
- provides an overview of the current regulatory framework applicable to social media and video-sharing platforms;
- presents the current safe harbour regime, and the main conditions required for it to apply; and
- describes legal frameworks and enforcement regimes used to control the posting and sharing of illegal or harmful content by users of social media and video-sharing platforms.
Harmful and illegal content shared on social media: different approaches around the world
In all the countries analysed for this benchmark, social media benefit from a form of safe harbour whereby providers may not be held liable for illegal content uploaded by their users if certain conditions are met.
However, each jurisdiction defines what is illegal and what platforms should do to counter the spread of illegal or harmful content. The benchmark covers child pornography, copyright infringements, fake news, terrorism and incitement to violence, and other potential infringements such as cyber-bullying and defamation.
"Fair compensation" of news publishers
Among the 12 jurisdictions covered in this benchmark, several introduced or proposed new legislation mandating that online platforms, such as Google and Facebook, pay news publishers (including local news publishers and broadcast media) for content made available on their online platforms.
For more information and to access the benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our Global Trends service.
07 December 23
Consumer rules for digital services contracts: cancellation button, price increase and automatic renewals
Our new benchmark looks at consumer protection rules in 17 EU countries in relation to some aspects of contracts for digital services, including subscription video-on-demand services.
04 December 23
Dynamic blocking injunctions to fight against online piracy – Overview in 13 European countries
We have just published a new benchmark showing in thirteen selected European countries if there are specific procedures (beyond court decisions) on dynamic blocking injunctions and the type(s) of authority involved in the process.
29 November 23
How quickly should telecoms providers respond to a consumer complaint?
When facing any kind of issue regarding for example quality of service, access or billing, consumers should first address a complaint to their service provider, before referring to the national regulator, mediator, or any other competent authority. Cullen International’s research shows that, in six of the 15 European countries studied, there are no rules setting a maximum timeframe for providers to respond to a complaint.