According to article 6 of the Cross-Border Parcel Regulation (CBPR) and the European Commission’s guidelines to NRAs on the transparency and assessment of cross-border parcel tariffs, NRAs should each year assess whether USPs’ cross-border single piece tariffs are “unreasonably high”. However, the definition of what constitutes an unreasonably high tariff is not defined specifically and is thus open to the interpretation of the NRAs.
Cullen International’s new benchmark shows that levels of compliance with the requirements of article 6 of the Cross-border parcels regulation have been patchy.
Many NRAs have failed to submit their assessments to the Commission by the required deadline, with some failing to make a submission at all.
Where NRAs did submit their assessments, there have been few findings of unreasonably high cross-border tariffs, with NRAs in only two countries finding unreasonably high tariffs in 2019 and only three in 2020.
To access the full benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our Postal service.
more news
25 April 24
[Cullen Explainer] Capital and purchased goods amount to most scope 3 emissions of telecoms operators
Our latest Explainer looks into scope 3 emissions, focusing on the reporting practices of telecoms operators.
22 April 24
Who has not transposed the European Electronic Communications Code yet?
Cullen International’s benchmark analyses the status of transposition of the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) across the EU 27 plus UK and Norway.
18 April 24
Countries in the Americas are working towards the transparency and explainability of AI-based decisions
The latest update of Cullen International’s benchmark on AI reveals whether governments in the Americas published or proposed specific strategies to foster the adoption of AI-based services.