Cullen International has published a comparison between the current EU Audiovisual Media Services (AVMS) Directive and the new directive which was agreed by the European Parliament and the Council on 26 April 2018.
The institutions reached an agreement on most of the substantial provisions. The directive still needs to be formally adopted.
The new directive will:
- impose more rules on on-demand services established in the EU (e.g. Netflix) such as new quotas requirements on EU works, stronger obligations to protect minors, and some additional restrictions on alcohol advertising;
- cover video-sharing platforms. In particular it will require these platforms to take measures to protect minors from harmful content and to protect citizens from hate-speech, and to comply with rules (that apply to linear and on-demand services) to protect consumers against inappropriate or subliminal advertising;
- replace the current advertising limit for linear broadcast services of 20% of a clock hour by a more flexible daily limit (also of 20%) applying between 7am to 6pm. In addition to the daily limit, it will add a limit of 20% from 6pm to 12pm (prime-time window).
The core principles of the directive remain in place, i.e. minimum harmonisation and the country of origin principle. However, member states will be able to impose investment obligations for EU or national works or to levy taxes to fund national production on services (linear and on-demand) established in another member state but targeting their national audience, under certain conditions.
more news
04 November 26
In nine European countries, national symmetric obligations on access to ducts go beyond the scope set by the Gigabit Infrastructure Act
Cullen International's latest benchmark analyses asymmetric and symmetric duct access obligations in Europe.
04 November 26
More than 60 cases and counting: a snapshot of European antitrust enforcement against big tech
Cullen International’s latest report on past and pending antitrust cases against big tech companies in Europe tracks enforcement activity under ex post antitrust rules at EU and national level.
30 October 26
Many governments around the globe rely on legal mechanisms to compel communications apps to cooperate in law enforcement investigations
Cullen International's latest Global Trends benchmark for number-independent communications apps regulation found that nearly all of the 13 surveyed jurisdictions around the world provide some legal mechanism to make these apps assist law enforcement in criminal investigations. There are requirements to verify user identities, compel disclosure of stored content, make encrypted content accessible, and duties to detect illegal content within private communications.