New Global Trends research highlights several countries around the world intensified efforts in countering online scams, including by updating some of their respective regulatory frameworks.
Data on online scams in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Africa, the UK and the US shows that scams are increasing, and so are the losses reported by victims.
The increasing availability of digital payment platforms and apps, some of them offered by non-banking institutions, has offered economic and social opportunities all over the world. At the same time, only a small fraction of scam victims manages to block in time or recover money sent to scammers via instant payments.
Among the countries analysed in this Global Trends research, some already implemented technical measures that facilitate the detection and blocking of suspicious incoming calls and/or messages.
New regulatory proposals are currently being debated in some countries on:
- the possible review of current liability frameworks applicable to online service providers and financial institutions; and
- whether (and how) scams victims should be compensated for their financial losses.
For more information and access to the report, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our Global Trends service.
more news
19 December 25
CSRD transposition: Belgium, Denmark, Finland and Slovenia transpose the “stop-the-clock” directive
Cullen International’s updated benchmark tracks the progress made by the 27 EU member states in transposing the CSRD and the related “stop-the-clock” directive.
19 December 25
Global trends in AI regulation
Our latest Global Trends benchmark compares policies and regulations on artificial intelligence (AI) across 14 jurisdictions around the world.
19 December 25
Implementation of European Media Freedom Act: general overview in 12 EU member states
Our new Media benchmark shows if there are initiatives/rules in the selected countries which aim to put into application the EU Media Freedom Act (EMFA). If yes, it describes the scope of the main measures proposed. The benchmark also provides information on the next legislative or regulatory steps.