According to a new Global Trends benchmark, only a few countries around the world have explicitly defined over-the-top (OTT) interpersonal communication platforms like WhatsApp and WeChat in their legal and regulatory frameworks.
However, in most countries analysed, regulatory authorities performed impact assessments of these services. In some cases, regulators also revised regulatory regimes in the respective countries in order to protect competition, consumers, or national security.
The new benchmark, covering Australia, Brazil, China, the EU, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, South Africa, Turkey and the US, analyses OTT voice and messaging services and apps from three different angles:
- Definitions and impact assessments by national authorities.
- Key obligations imposed on OTT providers, including licensing, in-country legal presence, and interoperability requirements.
- Law enforcement framework and collaboration duties imposed on OTT providers, including user identity verification, metadata retention, and access by authorities to the content of end-users’ calls and messages.
For more information and to access the benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our Global Trends service.
more news
17 December 25
Changes to the postal USO are more common across European countries
Our latest benchmark shows information on the modernisation of the postal universal service obligation (USO), including studies and consultations, as well as actual changes made to the USO scope across 22 European countries.
16 December 25
Most European submarine cable operators have reporting obligations in case of outages
Our new benchmark investigates regulatory obligations for submarine cable operators in Europe (authorisation regime, reporting obligations in case of outages), the identification of high-risk vendors and special government power on submarine cables.
15 December 25
Global trends in copyright and AI
Our latest Global Trends benchmark provides key insights on how 14 jurisdictions are addressing the growing intersection between copyright law and artificial intelligence (AI).