Connected vehicles generate data that can be used to provide or enhance services such as navigation, traffic information, roadside assistance, remote diagnostics, usage-based insurance (dependent on driving behaviour), on-demand entertainment or fleet management. Examples of data generated by connected vehicles include geolocation, usage (e.g. driving style) and technical data (e.g. speed, wear and tear affecting a vehicle’s parts). Data generated by connected vehicles may in some cases be personal data, unless it is anonymised.
Cullen International’s new benchmark examines the policy and regulatory aspects related to the development of connected and automated vehicles in eleven European countries, including specific rules applicable to data generated by connected vehicles.
The research shows whether the researched countries:
- have published rules and/or guidance by data protection authorities (DPAs) that are specifically applicable to data generated by connected vehicles;
- restrict the processing of personal data in the context of connected vehicles, including setting specific data retention periods; and
- set specific rules on access by third parties to vehicle data.
The research reveals that DPAs in four countries (Austria, Belgium, Germany and France) set specific rules and/or guidance. See visual overview
In these four countries, the national rules/guidance restrict the processing of personal data in the context of connected cars. For example, Belgium, France and Germany lay down specific rules for the processing of geolocation data (although in Belgium, these rules only apply in the context of an employment relationship).
France and Germany also set specific rules on access to vehicle data by third parties, such as law enforcement authorities, rescue services, or insurance companies.
To access the full benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our European Digital Economy service.
more news
04 November 26
In nine European countries, national symmetric obligations on access to ducts go beyond the scope set by the Gigabit Infrastructure Act
Cullen International's latest benchmark analyses asymmetric and symmetric duct access obligations in Europe.
04 November 26
More than 60 cases and counting: a snapshot of European antitrust enforcement against big tech
Cullen International’s latest report on past and pending antitrust cases against big tech companies in Europe tracks enforcement activity under ex post antitrust rules at EU and national level.
30 October 26
Many governments around the globe rely on legal mechanisms to compel communications apps to cooperate in law enforcement investigations
Cullen International's latest Global Trends benchmark for number-independent communications apps regulation found that nearly all of the 13 surveyed jurisdictions around the world provide some legal mechanism to make these apps assist law enforcement in criminal investigations. There are requirements to verify user identities, compel disclosure of stored content, make encrypted content accessible, and duties to detect illegal content within private communications.