On 4 September 2019, Cullen International hosted a seminar on zero rating. Three different studies issued by the OECD, the Austrian regulator RTR and Epicenter.works were presented by their authors.
Professor Axel Gautier (University of Liege) presented a summary of the main findings of the three studies.
The OECD and RTR studies show that, because of the variety of offers available, the effects of zero rating practices are not systematic and require a case-by-case approach from regulators around the globe.
Zero rating consists in exempting specific types of traffic from the data cap included in the end user’s subscription.
In Europe, the 2015 Telecoms Single Market Regulation (TSM) does not explicitly ban zero rating practices.
However, national regulatory authorities (NRAs) should examine practices on a case-by-case basis and should be able to intervene when "agreements or commercial practices would, by reason of their scale, lead to situations where end users' choice is materially reduced in practice".
The 2016 BEREC guidelines on the implementation of these net neutrality provisions confirm that NRAs should use a case-by-case approach to assess if “end users’ choice is materially reduced in practice” by a specific offer.
Available presentations from the event:
- Verena Weber - OECD study on the effects of zero rating
- András Róbert Király and Anton Schwarz – RTR study on Zero-Rating in the EU - An empirical investigation into the effects on data caps and prices in 15 countries
- Prof Axel Gautier (University of Liège) - Discussion with participants
Download Cullen International's infographic on the state of play of Zero Rating
more news
04 November 26
In nine European countries, national symmetric obligations on access to ducts go beyond the scope set by the Gigabit Infrastructure Act
Cullen International's latest benchmark analyses asymmetric and symmetric duct access obligations in Europe.
04 November 26
More than 60 cases and counting: a snapshot of European antitrust enforcement against big tech
Cullen International’s latest report on past and pending antitrust cases against big tech companies in Europe tracks enforcement activity under ex post antitrust rules at EU and national level.
30 October 26
Many governments around the globe rely on legal mechanisms to compel communications apps to cooperate in law enforcement investigations
Cullen International's latest Global Trends benchmark for number-independent communications apps regulation found that nearly all of the 13 surveyed jurisdictions around the world provide some legal mechanism to make these apps assist law enforcement in criminal investigations. There are requirements to verify user identities, compel disclosure of stored content, make encrypted content accessible, and duties to detect illegal content within private communications.