Increased use of internet-based services has stimulated a debate, among government authorities, on whether and how to collect domestic taxes on such services, regardless of where service providers are established/incorporated. This approach is challenging, since it may not be clear whether a service is provided to a specific audience. It may also be difficult to track service provision itself. Cullen International's new benchmark summarises initiatives already in force and proposals under discussion in the Americas.
While all countries in the Americas impose national and/or local taxes on the sale of all goods and services to resident individuals or businesses, most countries covered in this report have already adapted their legal frameworks to explicitly address tax obligations for digital economy services, including in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Canada and the US.
Canada, with its federal and local tax regimes in place, clarified tax filing obligations on digital economy revenues, including for foreign companies targeting Canadian residents.
The US, on the other hand, does not make any distinction between digital and non-digital services, given that taxes must be paid on all revenues, unless specific tax exemptions apply. However, some local governments decided to impose a specific local tax on digital economy products and services.
more news
19 December 25
CSRD transposition: Belgium, Denmark, Finland and Slovenia transpose the “stop-the-clock” directive
Cullen International’s updated benchmark tracks the progress made by the 27 EU member states in transposing the CSRD and the related “stop-the-clock” directive.
19 December 25
Global trends in AI regulation
Our latest Global Trends benchmark compares policies and regulations on artificial intelligence (AI) across 14 jurisdictions around the world.
19 December 25
Implementation of European Media Freedom Act: general overview in 12 EU member states
Our new Media benchmark shows if there are initiatives/rules in the selected countries which aim to put into application the EU Media Freedom Act (EMFA). If yes, it describes the scope of the main measures proposed. The benchmark also provides information on the next legislative or regulatory steps.