The wider social benefits provided by broadcasting, such as the promotion of culture and education, can be argued to justify free or low cost access to the radio spectrum used by broadcasters. Where fees are charged, these can be calculated either by reference to the economic value of the spectrum (as a scarce resource) or in order to cover the spectrum management costs incurred by the regulator, such as from issuing licences and investigating interference.
This new research shows if a fee related to the use or value of the radio spectrum is imposed on providers of TV broadcasting services in seven American countries. Where applicable, it also shows details of the fees, and how they are calculated. Brazil, Chile and Colombia impose fees for the use or value of TV spectrum. However, the USA, Canada, Mexico and Argentina only collect fees based on the costs of processing spectrum licence applications, i.e. not reflecting the economic value of the spectrum.
This new benchmark has been published in the scope of our Americas Media service.
more news
25 April 24
[Cullen Explainer] Capital and purchased goods amount to most scope 3 emissions of telecoms operators
Our latest Explainer looks into scope 3 emissions, focusing on the reporting practices of telecoms operators.
22 April 24
Who has not transposed the European Electronic Communications Code yet?
Cullen International’s benchmark analyses the status of transposition of the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) across the EU 27 plus UK and Norway.
18 April 24
Countries in the Americas are working towards the transparency and explainability of AI-based decisions
The latest update of Cullen International’s benchmark on AI reveals whether governments in the Americas published or proposed specific strategies to foster the adoption of AI-based services.