The wider social benefits provided by broadcasting, such as the promotion of culture and education, can be argued to justify free or low cost access to the radio spectrum used by broadcasters. Where fees are charged, these can be calculated either by reference to the economic value of the spectrum (as a scarce resource) or in order to cover the spectrum management costs incurred by the regulator, such as from issuing licences and investigating interference.
This new research shows if a fee related to the use or value of the radio spectrum is imposed on providers of TV broadcasting services in seven American countries. Where applicable, it also shows details of the fees, and how they are calculated. Brazil, Chile and Colombia impose fees for the use or value of TV spectrum. However, the USA, Canada, Mexico and Argentina only collect fees based on the costs of processing spectrum licence applications, i.e. not reflecting the economic value of the spectrum.
This new benchmark has been published in the scope of our Americas Media service.
more news
22 October 26
IoT regulation: new operational requirements reshape global connectivity
Cullen International's Quarterly Regulatory Update on IoT and M2M Services (Q3 2026) highlights how national regulators around the globe are shaping the future of IoT and M2M services.
21 October 26
Americas countries require satellite service providers to obtain a spectrum licence
Cullen International’s latest benchmark compares satellite regulation across the Americas, including service and spectrum licensing, registration requirements, spectrum allocations and fees, interference rules, migration between frequency bands and recent regulatory developments.
21 October 26
Around the world, many regulators examined communications apps through distinct lenses, but their interventions did not always lead to any enforcement
Cullen International's latest Global Trends benchmark for communications apps regulation shows how telecoms, consumer protection, data protection and competition regulators intervene in the number-independent communications apps sector. The benchmark addresses regulation apps such as WhatsApp, WeChat and iMessage across 13 jurisdictions around the world.